Archived Forum Post
Index of archived forum posts
Question:
Archived Forum PostQuestion:
Hello,
using the latest release and very always gets
System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at ClsMailMan.DeleteBundle(ClsMailMan , ClsEmailBundle , ProgressEvent* )
at Chilkat.MailMan.DeleteBundle(EmailBundle bundle)
debug file:
DeleteBundle:
DllDate: Mar 9 2015
ChilkatVersion: 9.5.0.48
UnlockPrefix: xxx
Username: xxx
Architecture: Little Endian; 64-bit
Language: .NET 4.5 / x64
VerboseLogging: 1
PopCmdSent: DELE 382
sendCommand: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
PopCmdResp: +OK Deleted.
getOneLineResponse: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
message successfully marked for delete
PopCmdSent: DELE 383
sendCommand: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
PopCmdResp: +OK Deleted.
getOneLineResponse: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
message successfully marked for delete
PopCmdSent: DELE 384
sendCommand: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
PopCmdResp: +OK Deleted.
getOneLineResponse: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
message successfully marked for delete
PopCmdSent: DELE 385
sendCommand: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
PopCmdResp: +OK Deleted.
getOneLineResponse: Elapsed time: 0 millisec
message successfully marked for delete
Please check to see if this new build fixes the problem:
32-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-win32.zip
64-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-x64.zip
Already tested, unfortunatelly not
What is more the same exception is with HttpRequest.RemoveParam too
So far I was using ver 9.4.1.0 with success
After upgrading to newest release many problems with System.AccessViolationException
The problem with HttpRequest.RemoveParam should've been fixed with the build I just provided you. I suspect it's possible you're not actually using the new build I just provided. Please post the debug log file created via the DebugLogFilePath property (for the DeleteBundle crash).
RemoveParam looks working good - thanks
Now I recive same error with GetEmail
Email email = bundle.GetEmail(j);
Unhandled Exception: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write
protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
at ClsEmailBundle.GetEmail(ClsEmailBundle* , Int32 )
at Chilkat.EmailBundle.GetEmail(Int32 index)
at MyApp.EmailEngine3.<>c__DisplayClass12.<>c__DisplayClass1
7.<Start>b__9(Int32 j)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Parallel.<>c__DisplayClassf`1.<ForWorker>b__c()
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InnerInvokeWithArg(Task childTask)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.<>c__DisplayClass11.<ExecuteSelfReplicating>b_
_10(Object param0)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionCo
ntext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, C
ontextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal(Task& currentTaskSlot)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteEntry(Boolean bPreventDoubleExecution)
at System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueue.Dispatch()
I'm processing bundle (that contains 500 mails) with Parallel.For
Parallel.For(0, bundle.MessageCount,
new ParallelOptions {CancellationToken = CTS.Token, MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 50}, j =>
{
CTS.Token.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
Email email = bundle.GetEmail(j);
That exception is random - for testing I'm processing one account many times
Full log from pop3 session is here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2hgp7unho0d104s/mail.txt?dl=0
Thanks! This is much better information. I will work on a fix today..
Please check to see if this new build fixes the problem:
32-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-win32.zip
64-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-x64.zip
Hi, so far no problem with mails, but:
Unhandled Exception: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write
protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
at ClsHttp.SynchronousRequest(ClsHttp* , XString* , Int32 , Boolean , ClsHttp
Request* , ProgressEvent* )
at Chilkat.Http.SynchronousRequest(String domain, Int32 port, Boolean ssl, Ht
tpRequest req)
at MyApp.Submitter.FastEngine.Submit2(String url)
at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , CodeContext , Object )
at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecute2[T0,T1,TRet](CallSite site
, T0 arg0, T1 arg1)
at Microsoft.Scripting.Interpreter.DynamicInstruction`3.Run(InterpretedFrame
frame)
at Microsoft.Scripting.Interpreter.Interpreter.Run(InterpretedFrame frame)
at Microsoft.Scripting.Interpreter.LightLambda.Run2[T0,T1,TRet](T0 arg0, T1 a
rg1)
at IronPython.Compiler.PythonScriptCode.RunWorker(CodeContext ctx)
at IronPython.Compiler.RuntimeScriptCode.InvokeTarget(Scope scope)
at simpleseobox.Submitter.EngineRunner.<>c__DisplayClass1f.<>c__DisplayClass3
5.<Run>b__1b(String line, ParallelLoopState loopState, Int64 idx)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Parallel.<>c__DisplayClass32`2.<PartitionerForEachW
orker>b__30()
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InnerInvokeWithArg(Task childTask)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.<>c__DisplayClass11.<ExecuteSelfReplicating>b_
_10(Object param0)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionCo
ntext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, C
ontextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal(Task& currentTaskSlot)
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteEntry(Boolean bPreventDoubleExecution)
at System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueue.Dispatch()
Is there chance to solve AccessViolationException issues with this exception in newest version? Or I need to back to 9.4.1
Thanks. I would need to see the exact snippet of code that reproduces the problem. It's important to know, for example, if the object is being called in a multi-threaded (parallel) environment. Is the same instance of the Http object called in each thread, or a separate instance? Etc. There's likely an important piece of information I need that isn't being furnished by the stack trace alone.
Http object isn't shared - there are always new object created per thread
public bool Submit2(string url)
{
if (url != null && Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(url, UriKind.Absolute))
{
_uri = new Uri(url);
_req.Path = _uri.PathAndQuery;
}
else
{
_uri = _formUri;
}
_response = _http.SynchronousRequest(_uri.Host, _uri.Port, _uri.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttps, _req);
and:
private readonly Http _http = new Http();
private HttpRequest _req = new HttpRequest();
private HttpResponse _response;
public FastEngine()
{
bool success = _http.UnlockComponent("");
if (success != true)
{
MessageBox.Show("HTTP Unlock Error");
}
_userAgent = ConfigStorage.Instance.GetUserAgent();
_http.SetRequestHeader("User-Agent", _userAgent);
_http.CookieDir = "memory";
_http.SaveCookies = true;
int readTimeout = Convert.ToInt32(Settings.Default.readTimeout);
_maxContentLength = Convert.ToInt32(Settings.Default.maxContentLength)*1000;
_http.ConnectTimeout = Convert.ToInt32(Settings.Default.connectTimeout);
_validContentTypes = Settings.Default.validContentType.Split('\n');
_http.ReadTimeout = readTimeout;
_http.HeartbeatMs = readTimeout*1000/2;
_http.OnAbortCheck += (sender, args) =>
{
if (_abort)
{
args.Abort = true;
_abort = false;
}
};
and:
Parallel.ForEach(lines, ConfigStorage.Instance.EngineParallelOptions,
(line, loopState, idx) =>
{
try
{
ConfigStorage.Instance.EngineParallelOptions.CancellationToken
.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
using (var engine = new FastEngine
{
//here code for filling HttpRequest in engine
engine.Submit2(line);
})
Try this new build:
32-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-win32.zip
64-bit Download: http://www.chilkatsoft.com/download/preRelease/ChilkatDotNet45-9.5.0-x64.zip
Let me know if this solves it..